Only “fraudsters” complain about missing a Social Security Check?

Listen to this article free here.

No, Secretary Lutnick, a dysfunctional, defunded Social Security hurts all regular Americans, and they are not fraudsters

Lutnick has a net worth exceeding $1.5 billion, according to Bloomberg. Just saying.

The newly appointed billionaire in charge of Social Security just sat on stage and had the nerve to say this. Who is this? What absurd parallel reality does this guy live in?

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick spewed on a recent podcast that only “fraudsters” will complain about a missed Social Security check, and millions of seniors and people with disabilities felt a gut punch of anger. Lutnick suggested that his 94-year-old mother-in-law would quietly shrug off a missing check – implying that anyone who speaks up when their earned benefits don’t arrive must be up to no good​

Lutnick’s odd remark isn’t just an insult; it’s dangerously out of touch with the reality faced by Americans who rely on Social Security to survive.

Social Security Is a Lifeline for Millions, Not a Luxury. More than 70 million Americans receive Social Security benefits each month​ – retirees, disabled workers, widows and widowers, children who’ve lost parents. For many of them, that monthly check is all that stands between them and poverty. The average benefit is only about $1,800 a month​, a modest sum that is nevertheless a lifeline for those who earned it through a lifetime of work. According to the Social Security Administration’s data, over 7 million Americans aged 65+ rely on Social Security for at least 90% of their income​. And countless others have no other income at all – a 2020 analysis found that 40% of older Americans have nothing besides Social Security in retirement​. Without these earned benefits, poverty among seniors would skyrocket. In fact, Social Security currently keeps about 16.5 million older Americans out of poverty​; even so, more than 17 million seniors are still “economically insecure,” living on incomes near the poverty line​. For these Americans, Social Security isn’t a bonus or extra comfort – it’s the bare necessity that pays for shelter, food, medicine, and heat.

For millions of seniors, the thought of a missed Social Security check brings real fear and uncertainty about how to pay for food, rent, medicine, or electricity.

Speaking Up When Checks Stop Is Survival – Not Fraud. Lutnick’s kindergarten level assessment that “whoever screams” the loudest about a missing payment is the one “stealing”​ illustrates such a profound misunderstanding of the financial realities of a majority of beneficiaries.

When a Social Security check doesn’t arrive, it is an emergency. Bills don’t wait; landlords and utility companies won’t wait. Hunger certainly doesn’t wait. Any delay in payments is “catastrophic” because even a few days can threaten a person’s ability to pay for basic needs​. Any delay in Social Security caused by this billionaire, Lutnick, equals real economic hardship,”. The only people who could afford to stay silent about a missing check are those wealthy enough not to need it. For everyone else, speaking up isn’t suspicious; it’s absolutely necessary.

Does billionaire Lutnick cash in his Social Security check? Im sure he does. Does he need it? would he or his dear old mother in law even notice if it didn’t show up?

All of those “screaming” for their check need it to survive month to month – and data backs that up. Social Security’s own watchdogs estimate that fraud losses (such as stolen checks or identity theft) amount to roughly $100 million a year – just 0.006% of total benefits paid​. The unvarnished truth is that well over 99.99% of Social Security payments go to the rightful recipients. Lutnick’s notion of stopping payments to smoke out crooks turns this reality upside-down, treating millions of innocent seniors as collateral damage to maybe catch a tiny number of bad actors.No program is perfect. That approach is cruel and unacceptable. As Bill Sweeney of AARP notes, complaints about Social Security are common because they’re often the only way problems get solved – “almost every member of Congress has a staff person” devoted to helping constituents with Social Security issues​.

Are we to believe all those concerned callers to congressional offices – retirees who lost a check in the mail, widows struggling with a paperwork glitch – are fraudsters? Of course not. They are honest Americans rightfully demanding the benefits they earned.

Just one missed check spells disaster and Lutnick’s blithe example of his patient 94-year-old mother in law, who’d assume “it’ll come next month” is painfully out of touch with reality. For someone living check-to-check with no savings, a delayed Social Security check isn’t a fucking inconvenience – it means no food in the fridge, no money for rent, no electricity or phone, or life-sustaining medications.

Sandi Bachom, an 80-year-old retiree in New York, who was horrified to hear about new hurdles at Social Security offices. “What would happen if I didn’t get that check?” she asked. “I don’t have any family. Everybody’s dead. There’s no one to take care of me”​

Sandi credits Social Security with “saving my life” after she fell on hard times, and she’s terrified of losing it​. Or consider Rita, a 68-year-old from Illinois, who lives month to month on her Social Security and a small food assistance benefit. She receives about $1,680 in Social Security per month and just $23 in SNAP (food stamps), and even then she often can only afford one meal a day​. “I’m kind of isolated,” she says, describing how she rarely leaves home because she can’t spare money for social outings​. Imagine telling Rita that her check won’t come this month – and that she should just wait quietly. She would have nothing for groceries. She might not eat for days. These are not hypotheticals – these are the knife-edge realities that millions of our neighbors face. As one analysis by the Center for American Progress warned, “any delay or interruption in payments would be catastrophic” for beneficiaries like these​. Even a short holdup can put a low-income senior “on the brink” of eviction or hunger​. And a missed check? That could push someone over the edge entirely – an “irreparable harm” for many households​.

It’s not just seniors. Americans with disabilities often depend on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and are in equally precarious positions. More than 11 million people under 65 with disabilities rely on benefits from SSA.

By law, most cannot have significant savings – in fact, SSI rules cap beneficiaries to just a few thousand dollars in assets, effectively forcing them to live month-to-month​. “Too many SSDI and SSI recipients are one missed or late payment away from not making rent or putting food on the table,” disability advocates report​. That means a single missing check can unleash a cascade of crises: overdraft fees as bills bounce, utility shut-offs, skipped meals, and worsening health as medications are stretched or stopped. These Americans have earned their disability benefits by working until their health failed, or simply by the fact of severe hardship, and they depend on timely payments. For Lutnick to casually suggest that missing a payment is no big deal is a profound slap in the face to those who genuinely cannot afford to miss even one day’s worth of income.

Why would someone like Howard Lutnick imagine that “most people wouldn’t mind” if the government simply skipped a Social Security payment? The answer lies in privilege. Lutnick is a billionaire and a former Wall Street CEO​. (He made his fortune as the head of Cantor Fitzgerald, a major financial firm, and his net worth is estimated around $2 billion​.) For him, a few thousand dollars one month more or less is negligible – he likely spends that on a fancy dinner or a weekend trip. It’s easy to “wait patiently” when you’ll never have to choose between electricity and food. It’s easy for Lutnick’s 94-year-old mother-in-law to stay calm about a late check if, say, her wealthy son-in-law is there to cover any shortfall. But what about the 94-year-old widower who doesn’t have a rich family to backstop him? Lutnick’s comments reek of an out-of-touch, let them eat cake attitude: If you were honest, you’d suffer in silence. Nothing could be further from the American values of fairness and respect for those who worked hard and paid into the system.

Lutnick’s flippant theory also fits into a troubling narrative being pushed by some powerful figures who seem intent on tearing down Social Security under the guise of “fraud” and “efficiency.” As Commerce Secretary, Lutnick has been helping lead the Administration’s aggressive overhaul of the Social Security Administration – a campaign predicated on the claim that the system is full of waste. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, who is a leading voice in this effort, has absurdly declared that “Social Security is the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time” and insists there is “massive” fraud to be rooted out​. (Never mind that Social Security has reliably paid benefits for 89 years and is anything but a Ponzi scheme.) The Administration even installed a so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) team to hunt for fraud at SSA – a team that a federal judge just chastised for going on a baseless “fishing expedition” in search of a nonexistent “fraud epidemic”​. This is the context in which Lutnick voiced his chilling “solution”: stop payments and see who screams. In his world, missing payments aren’t a blunder to avoid – they’re a tool to wield. And the people hurt in the process? Collateral damage.

Our government’s duty is to its people – to the taxpayers and workers who earned their Social Security benefits – and that duty includes paying them fully and on time. For nearly nine decades, through wars and recessions, Social Security has never failed to send out checks​.

It is a sacred trust, one of the most successful and popular programs in our nation’s history. If, under the watch of officials like Lutnick, the U.S. government were to simply not send out money that people are entitled to, that would be a breach of trust of historic proportions. As Lee Saunders, president of the AFSCME union, put it, “For almost 90 years, Social Security has never missed a paycheck” – we must not start now​. Rather than musing about skipping payments, Secretary Lutnick ought to be moving heaven and earth to ensure that not a single Social Security check is late.

Even Lutnick’s own agency seemed to recognize his misstep. After his podcast comments drew outrage, a Commerce Department spokesperson scrambled to reassure the public that “The Secretary is committed to protecting Social Security for all eligible Americans.”​

Protecting Social Security means strengthening it – not casting suspicion on its recipients or normalizing the idea of defaulting on payments. Lutnick’s notion that honest seniors would meekly “think something got messed up” and wait indefinitely for Washington to get its act together is nothing short of gaslighting. It shifts blame from the government (which would be at fault for failing to pay on time) to the individual (who is somehow at fault for asking where their money is). In truth, when Social Security checks don’t arrive, the onus is on our leaders to fix the problem immediately – not on seniors to prove their innocence by staying quiet.

The voices of seniors, people with disabilities, and their advocates are rising in righteous fury because we know what’s at stake. Social Security is not a handout – it’s an earned benefit and a promise. The men and women who depend on their checks have every right to demand that promise be kept.Now they are “fraudsters” according to Lutnick when that promise is broken. Many are veterans who fought for this country, retired nurses and teachers who cared for us, disabled workers who lost their health through no fault of their own – and yes, they are our mothers, fathers, and grandparents who count on that check to get by. To smear these good people as scammers is beyond reprehensible.

Howard Lutnick’s dismissive comments have unintentionally done one thing: they’ve reminded us why Social Security is often called the “third rail” of politics. Touch it – or show blatant indifference to it – and you will ignite outrage. Well, consider that outrage ignited. The idea of missing even a single Social Security payment has awoken an anger in America’s seniors and disabled community never seen before, and rightly so. Lawmakers from both parties should take note: this is a line you do not cross. As one 80-year-old beneficiary said, there is no one to take care of me if my check doesn’t come​. That is the reality for millions. We will not stand by and let them be slaughtered like sacrificial lambs on the Trumpian throne.

Should Social Security checks be held hostage to political games?

Should action to improve Social Security’s customer service instead of gutting its workforce be implemented? Action is needed to strengthen the program so that benefits keep up with the cost of living and no senior or disabled person has to live in poverty and that is what “protecting Social Security” really means, and nothing less is acceptable.

If, God help us, Social Security checks were ever missed, the people will raise absolute hell about it – and their righteous anger will be the heroes of this story, refusing to be silent as their dignity and survival is destroyed.

And those who remain quiet? They have the resources to spare. Howard Lutnick may not understand the struggle of a senior choosing between food and medicine, but the rest of us do. We hear the voices of Americans who are saying “we can’t live without our Social Security”, and we raise our voices with them. They are not fraudsters. They are entitled – by law, by morality, and by basic human decency – to every penny they’ve been promised, on time, every time. And anyone in power who can’t grasp that has no business overseeing the livelihood or anything else that belongs to the American people.

Sources:

• Emily Peck, “Seniors won’t complain if they miss a Social Security check, Lutnick says,” Axios, Mar. 21, 2025​
  axios.com​axios.com​axios.com.
• Katherine Li, “Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says his mother-in-law wouldn’t complain if her Social Security check didn’t arrive,” Business Insider, Mar. 21, 2025​
  businessinsider.com​businessinsider.com​businessinsider.com​businessinsider.com.
• Social Security Administration, Monthly Statistical Snapshot, Feb. 2025​
  ssa.gov.
• National Institute on Retirement Security, “40% of Older Americans Rely Solely on Social Security for Retirement Income,” Jan. 2020​
  nirsonline.org.
• National Council on Aging, “Get the Facts on Economic Security for Seniors,” June 2024​
  ncoa.org​ncoa.org.
• Center for American Progress, “Cuts to the Social Security Administration Threaten Millions…,” Feb. 2025​
  americanprogress.org​americanprogress.org​americanprogress.org​americanprogress.org.
• Fatima Hussein & Matt Sedensky, “Social Security changes spark furor…,” Associated Press (via WRAL), Mar. 19, 2025​
  wral.com​wral.com.
• Allie Kelly, “A boomer living on $1,680 Social Security and SNAP struggles to afford food,” Business Insider, July 25, 2024​
  businessinsider.com​businessinsider.com.
• Emily Peck, “Judge slams Social Security chief for agency shutdown ‘threats’…,” Axios, Mar. 21, 2025​
  axios.com​axios.com.
• Hiranmayi Srinivasan, “Trump Appointee Howard Lutnick Is a Billionaire—See His Net Worth,” Investopedia, Dec. 10, 2024​
  investopedia.com.